.jpg)
Home equity investments, home equity agreements, shared appreciation agreements, and equity sharing contracts are no longer a niche financial product. They are now drawing national attention from courts, regulators, consumer attorneys, state attorneys general, and the housing finance industry.
Lawyers Realty Group is now expanding its homeowner protection services to include a focused practice area for homeowners dealing with Home Equity Investments, commonly known as HEIs, and related equity sharing agreements.
These products are often marketed as a way for homeowners to access cash without taking out a traditional loan. The advertisements usually emphasize no monthly payments, no traditional interest rate, and the ability to remain in the home. But many homeowners later discover that these contracts result in large payoff demands, recorded liens, title restrictions, refinance obstacles, or settlement obligations that make it difficult to sell, refinance, or keep the property long term.
The issue is not just whether the contract can be attacked legally. The real question is often whether the homeowner has a viable strategy to get away from the liens and other complications created by these HEI contracts.
That is where Lawyers Realty Group’s combined legal and real estate background becomes important. In active matters, the firm is challenging these agreements, negotiating with HEI companies, reviewing payoff demands, and helping homeowners evaluate practical settlement options with the lenders or investors, including refinancing or sale of the property only after the disputed demand has been significantly reduced.
Why HEIs Are Now Under National Scrutiny
Home equity investment products are facing growing examination as lawsuits mount and state regulators examine whether these products should be treated as mortgage-style financial products rather than simple investment contracts. The CFPB describes home equity contracts as arrangements where homeowners receive an upfront cash payment and later repay a lump sum based in part on the home’s value. Source: CFPB, Issue Spotlight: Home Equity Contracts: Market Overview.
Under an HEI, the homeowner receives upfront cash in exchange for a share of the home’s future value. The homeowner remains in the property and remains responsible for taxes, insurance, maintenance, existing mortgages, and other property obligations. Note, even though the equity “investor” claims a share of ownership, they clearly take no obligation for the property taxes, insurance, or home maintenance. The homeowner later pays off the HEI company’s interest when the home is sold, when the term expires, when a buyout occurs, or when another triggering event takes place.
Lawyers Realty Group has managed numerous cases involving home equity investment liens that restrict homeowners’ options, such as reverse mortgages and other refinancing opportunities. Additionally, homeowners have been prevented from undertaking certain refurbishments or repairs when such projects require a new lien on the property. Therefore, the assertion that these HEI contracts do not involve payments does not provide a complete picture. The substantial payoff amounts associated with these contracts remain as liens for the duration of the agreement, significantly limiting homeowners’ choices.
The marketing pitch is simple: no monthly payments. But the payoff and actual costs can be anything but simple.
The CFPB has warned that home equity contracts may involve risky, costly, and complex terms, including a large future lump-sum payment that can force a homeowner to sell if the amount cannot be paid when the contract matures or another triggering event occurs.
The Problem: No Monthly Payment Does Not Mean No Harm
One of the biggest consumer misunderstandings is the difference between no monthly payment and no harm. No monthly payment does not mean there is no lien, no limitation on refinancing or sale, no loss of control, and no mounting payoff demand.
HEI companies may argue that their products are not loans, do not charge interest, and instead involve an investment return or shared appreciation formula. But consumer attorneys and advocates argue that courts should look at substance over form, especially where the product involves upfront cash, a recorded interest in the home, and a large future payoff obligation.
The practical problem for homeowners is that the payoff demand may arrive years later, often when the homeowner is trying to sell, refinance, transfer the property, resolve an estate issue, or stop a foreclosure. At that point, the homeowner may feel trapped because the HEI company’s recorded interest can interfere with closing, refinancing, title clearance, or a sale.
Reported HEI Litigation and Payoff Shock
It is clear that litigation is building across multiple states.
In Colorado, a lawsuit reportedly alleged that homeowners received about $87,000 upfront but could be required to pay up to roughly $278,000 to exit the contract. In California, a class action complaint alleged that a Unison contract functioned as a reverse mortgage or shared appreciation loan and violated California consumer protection and mortgage laws.
Based upon the complicated calculations and formulas in these home investment contracts, it can become nearly impossible for the homeowner to calculate what the payoff might become over time. If these terms are viewed through the lens of mortgage lending, the final numbers would be completely illegal.
State Regulators Are Moving Toward Mortgage-Style Treatment
Federal oversight remains limited and state regulators are increasingly stepping into the gap. States including Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, North Carolina, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin have taken steps toward regulating HEIs under mortgage-style frameworks.
The Ninth Circuit held that the Unison agreement at issue met Washington’s statutory definition of a reverse mortgage and reversed dismissal of the homeowners’ Washington Consumer Protection Act claims. Olson v. Unison Agreement Corp., No. 23-2835, 2025 WL 2254522 (9th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025). Further, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell sued Hometap, alleging that its product functions as an unlawful reverse mortgage. Commonwealth v. Hometap Equity Partners, LLC, complaint filed Feb. 19, 2025. Maine also enacted LD 1901, defining and regulating HEIs as shared appreciation mortgage loans. Maine LD 1901.
That trend matters for California homeowners because it shows that the industry’s “this is not a loan” framing is increasingly failing under close scrutiny.
NCLC and CFPB Materials Support Careful Legal Review
The National Consumer Law Center has characterized many HEI products as predatory mortgage loans disguised as investments and has highlighted recent cases challenging these agreements, including Olson v. Unison Agreement Corp., Stone v. Real Estate Equity Exchange, Inc., Weingot v. Unison Agreement Corp., and other litigation involving HEI structures. Source: NCLC, Courts Expose Deception of Home Equity ‘Investments’; Lawyers Realty Group, Home Equity Investments and Equity Sharing Agreements: Predatory Loans Exposed.
For homeowners, the takeaway is simple: an HEI agreement should not be treated as a routine real estate document. It should be reviewed as a potentially high-risk financial and legal instrument affecting title, equity, refinance options, sale strategy, foreclosure risk, and long-term ownership rights.
Major HEI and Equity Sharing Companies Homeowners May Encounter
Homeowners may see these products under many names and company brands. Major companies and product names in the HEI and equity sharing space include Point, Hometap, Unlock, Unison, Splitero, QuantmRE, EquiFi, HomePace, AspireHEI, and Balance Homes. Homeowners may also encounter older or related names such as Patch Homes, Noah, EquityChoice, Bonus Homes, Landed, Haus, Fraction, Rex, and EasyKnock. Company names, affiliates, servicing entities, and recorded document names may vary, so homeowners should review the actual agreement, payoff statement, and recorded title documents before assuming who owns or controls the claimed interest.
This list does not mean every company uses the same contract, every product is unlawful, or every homeowner has the same claim. The point is that homeowners should identify exactly what they signed, what was recorded against the property, who currently owns or services the contract, and how the payoff demand was calculated.
The Resolution Strategy: Legal Attack Plus Practical Exit Plan
A homeowner facing an HEI problem usually needs more than a legal theory.
While it is possible to challenge an agreement as a disguised loan, unlawful reverse mortgage, unconscionable contract, unfair business practice, or improperly disclosed financial product, homeowners generally require a concrete resolution strategy. Legal action alone does not automatically make these liens vanish. Even where strong rescission or recharacterization arguments exist, courts may require the homeowner to address tender, undisputed amounts, or practical payoff issues before final relief is complete. Thus, having an exit plan that includes funding to address these issues is essential.
Lawyers Realty Group focuses on both sides of the problem:
1. Legal challenge: Review the contract, recorded documents, disclosures, payoff demand, appraisal assumptions, investor formula, settlement event, and applicable law.
2. Negotiation strategy: Challenge inflated or unsupported payoff demands and press for a reduced settlement where the facts and law support it.
3. Refinance strategy: Where appropriate, help the homeowner evaluate whether refinancing can be used to pay off a reduced settlement and preserve the property.
4. Sale strategy: If selling is the best or only viable option, help the homeowner list and sell the property after the HEI demand has been challenged, negotiated, or reduced.
5. Foreclosure and title strategy: Where a foreclosure, default, probate issue, reverse mortgage, or title dispute overlaps with the HEI, coordinate the legal and real estate strategy so the homeowner is not forced into a bad outcome.
Lawyers Realty Group Is Actively Fighting HEI Matters for Homeowners
Lawyers Realty Group is actively representing homeowners in disputes involving home equity investments and equity sharing agreements. In active cases, the firm has challenged payoff demands, analyzed current case law, negotiated reductions, and helped homeowners move toward practical resolutions.
In a recent matter, Lawyers Realty Group was able to negotiate a reduction of more than $200,000 from an asserted HEI payoff demand, helping the homeowner move forward from a stronger position. Source: Lawyers Realty Group, California Home Equity Investment Payoff Dispute.
In some matters, the best outcome may be a refinance after the demand is reduced. In others, the best outcome may be a sale of the property after the homeowner is no longer trapped by an inflated or disputed payoff demand. In either case, the goal is to protect as much home equity as possible and prevent the HEI company from controlling the homeowner’s next move.
When to Request a Legal Review
Homeowners should not assume that an HEI payoff demand is correct, final, or non-negotiable.
Before selling, refinancing, paying the demand, or giving up equity, homeowners should have the agreement, title documents, payoff statement, and settlement calculation reviewed.
Contact Lawyers Realty Group Today at (949) 264-0966
Lawyers Realty Group offers legal and real estate strategy for homeowners dealing with home equity investments, equity sharing agreements, shared appreciation contracts, and disputed payoff demands.
Never let an investor, lender, servicer, or title demand pressure you into paying a number you do not understand. Speak with an attorney before you sell, refinance, sign a payoff agreement, or give up equity in your home.
Reach out to our Attorney/Realtor today at (949) 264-0966 for a free legal analysis of your options. We will outline the best course of action without cost or obligation.
Lawyers Realty Group was established over 20 years ago to provide a higher level of professional representation for homeowners in difficult situations. By combining legal representation with real estate transactional services, homeowners receive coordinated support designed to protect equity and evaluate practical solutions.
